March 01, 2011
James Davison Hunter's book To Change the World: The Irony, Tragedy & Possibility of Christianity in the Late Modern World has been hailed as one of the most significant Christian books for some time. It has, perhaps, been a little over-hyped, but has certainly challenged my thinking about Christian engagement with the world, which is Hunter’s aim:
I contend that the dominant ways of thinking about culture and cultural change are flawed, for they are based upon both specious social science and problematic theology. In brief, the model upon which various strategies are based not only does not work, but it cannot work. (p5)
Hunter begins by critiquing the assumptions that have driven Christian public engagement and action. The essence of culture, he argues, is not found simply in the 'hearts and minds of individuals', that is, in what are called 'values' (p6). This fails to take into account the factors that give cultures strength and resilience over time. Change does not occur through the power of great ideas alone, but as these ideas meet elite networks and institutions, penetrate them and then spread their influence through new institutions and networks of influence. Wilberforce, Churchill, Martin Luther King, Mandela and others did not change the world by simply holding to the right values. At every point of significant cultural change there is ‘rich patronage’ that resources intellectuals and educators who within their networks ‘..imagine, theorize and propagate an alternative culture’(p5). Overlapping networks of leaders and resources come together and give a critical mass to the ideals, practices and goods of an alternative culture.
Hunter is at pains to stress that while evangelism and social reform are right priorities for the church, the working theory of culture on which they are based is flawed. Churches and individuals pursue right agendas to make Christ known in word and deed, but they often do this from a position of isolation on the periphery. His stress on networks, and in particular the penetration of elite networks, seems timely to me as I observe many Christians fleeing the professions, schools and universities to train for full-time ministry. Significant cultural change requires some Christians to be operating at the centre of elite networks not in enclaves. We are also reminded, helpfully, that at key moments in history new institutions are created that give form and expression to the emerging culture, such as those created during the conversion of Barbarian Europe, and later in the Reformation.
Hunter identifies three common 'paradigms of engagement' with culture and the world:
While acknowledging these major paradigms are not without biblical justification, Hunter argues that ultimately they fail to effect major cultural change and make a difference for the Kingdom of God.
Drawing on real-life examples, and careful historical and cultural analysis, he suggests an alternative way for Christians to spend their lives for God and engage with the world, which he calls ‘faithful presence’:
...where and to the extent that we are able, faithful presence commits us to do what we can to create conditions in the structures of social life we inhabit that are conducive to the flourishing of all. (p247)
No book is perfect, and it is difficult to undertake the kind of analysis Hunter has attempted without oversimplifying the many complex and diverse expressions of Christian faith. It would also be easy to complain that the reader is offered little practical guidance on how to practice ‘faithful presence’. There is also a hidden danger in his approach: too many Christians in the past have pursued the path of elite networks for personal gain rather than the Kingdom of God. Despite this, I think Hunter’s book should be a major corrective to how many of us think. The strengths of his work are the methodical discussion of culture and our capacity to influence it, the evidence presented in relation to the nature of cultural change and his critique of the way the Church deals with the challenges of pluralism and increasing secularisation.
The full benefit of Hunter's work will only occur as people read it, discuss it with others and consider its implications for life. How does the way we live in our various relational communities, and as we interact with key institutions, contribute to the flourishing of all? This is a book that deserves to be read by many and discussed at length.
 By Tim Keller, Charles Taylor, Nicholas Wolterstorff and Justin Taylor, to name a few.
 A longer version of this review can be found on the CASE blog (http://andjustincase.blogspot.com/2011/06/to-change-world-review.html).
Comments will be approved before showing up.